Companies cannot pay for placement in our rankings. DollarVisor is funded by advertising, never by commissions on what we recommend.

Investing Q&A

Growth vs Value Stocks: What’s the Difference?

Growth vs value stocks comes down to price. Growth stocks are priced for fast expansion; value stocks are priced cheaply against their earnings, book value and sales. In practice these are i…

TL;DR: Growth vs value stocks comes down to price. Growth stocks are priced for fast expansion; value stocks are priced cheaply against their earnings, book value and sales. In practice these are index labels, not company types, and the same stock can sit on both sides. Our verdict: growth has won every long stretch since 2001, but you pay more for it and the ride is rougher.

1. What growth and value actually mean

Quick Answer: A growth stock is one investors expect to grow sales and earnings faster than average, so they pay a high price for each dollar of profit. A value stock trades at a low price against its earnings, book value and sales. The difference in how you invest is what you are paying for: future expansion, or today’s numbers.

Both labels describe the price tag, not the quality of the business. A growth company is not automatically better run. A value company is not automatically a bargain. The label only tells you what the market currently believes.

  • Growth is a bet on the gap closing upward. The price already assumes rapid expansion. If growth slows, the price falls hard, because there was little cushion in it.
  • Value is a bet on the discount being wrong. The price assumes trouble, slow decline or a boring future. If the business simply holds steady, the discount can close.
  • Neither is a rule about company size. Growth and value both run from huge to tiny, which is a separate question from market cap.

One more thing worth clearing up early. “Value” does not mean cheap in dollars. A $600 stock can be a value stock and a $12 stock can be a growth stock. The comparison is always price against earnings, book value or sales, never price on its own.

Key takeaway: Growth and value describe what you pay relative to the numbers, not how good the company is. Two healthy businesses can land on opposite sides.

Not sure which side your funds sit on?

Most people hold a style tilt they never chose, buried inside a broad fund. Compare index funds and ETFs →

Before the numbers, here is a short explainer covering the same ground.

Video: Value vs. Growth Stocks: What’s the Difference | J.P. Morgan

2. How index companies draw the line

Quick Answer: S&P scores every company in the S&P 500 on three growth factors and three value factors, then splits the index roughly in half by market value. Stocks that score on both sides get their market cap divided between the two indexes, so one company can sit in the growth fund and the value fund at the same time.

Nobody at a stock exchange stamps a company “growth” or “value.” Index providers apply a formula, and the S&P U.S. Style Indices methodology spells out exactly which six numbers decide it.

The Six Factors That Sort Every S&P 500 Stock
The three growth factors and three value factors S&P Dow Jones Indices uses to score companies for its U.S. style indices, June 2026 methodology.
Growth score is built from Value score is built from
Three-year earnings per share growth rate over current price Book value to price ratio
Three-year sales per share growth rate Earnings to price ratio
Momentum, the 12-month price change Sales to price ratio

Source: S&P Dow Jones Indices, S&P U.S. Style Indices Methodology, June 2026.

Two details follow from that formula, and both surprise people.

First, momentum counts. A stock that has simply gone up a lot in the past year scores higher on growth, whatever its business is doing. Second, S&P’s stated design goal is to divide the total float market value of the parent index roughly equally into growth and value while limiting how many stocks overlap. Companies without a clear lean get their market cap distributed across both, as First Trust also describes in its July 2026 style comparison.

The arithmetic gives it away. The iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF held 147 stocks on June 30, 2026, and its value counterpart held 438. Add those together and you get 585 positions drawn from a 500-stock index.

Apple was the single largest holding in the S&P 500 value fund at 7.32%, while also sitting third in the growth fund at 5.98%.

Key takeaway: Growth and value are not two separate sets of companies. They are two slices of the same 500, and the slices overlap.

3. What each side actually owns right now

Quick Answer: Buying growth today mostly means buying technology. Information technology alone was 52.2% of the S&P 500 growth fund on June 30, 2026, against 20.6% of the value fund. Value spreads across financials, health care, industrials and energy instead. The style choice is really a sector choice, which matters for your asset allocation.

Sector Weights: Growth Fund vs Value Fund
Sector weights for the iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF and iShares S&P 500 Value ETF as of June 30, 2026.
Sector Growth fund Value fund
Information technology

52.2%

20.6%

Communication

15.2%

2.9%

Financials

8.7%

15.5%

Health care

6.2%

12.2%

Industrials

6.9%

11.4%

Energy

0.0%

6.6%

Sources: iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF and iShares S&P 500 Value ETF fact sheets, June 30, 2026; value communication weight per First Trust. Bars scaled to the largest weight shown.

Energy is the cleanest example. It is roughly 6.6% of the value fund and does not appear in the growth fund’s sector list at all. If you buy growth, you are choosing to own almost no oil and gas.

The technology weight cuts both ways. It powered growth’s recent run, and it is also the single biggest thing that could reverse it.

Key takeaway: A growth tilt is a technology bet in disguise. A value tilt is a bet on banks, hospitals, factories and energy.

4. Price, income and the ride you get

Quick Answer: On June 30, 2026, the growth fund traded at 36.83 times earnings against 24.61 for value, paid a 0.38% yield against 1.63%, and swung about a third harder. The fees were identical at 0.18%, so the cost difference is not what separates them, though fees still matter, as our guide to the expense ratio explains.

Growth Fund vs Value Fund Profile, June 2026
Valuation, income, concentration and risk characteristics for the iShares S&P 500 Growth and Value ETFs as of June 30, 2026.
Measure Growth Value
Price to earnings 36.83x 24.61x
Price to book 9.82x 3.64x
30-day SEC yield 0.38% 1.63%
Number of holdings 147 438
Top 10 holdings 56.4% 23.8%
3-year standard deviation 16.56% 12.14%
Expense ratio 0.18% 0.18%

Sources: iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF and iShares S&P 500 Value ETF fact sheets, June 30, 2026.

The concentration line is the one most people miss. Ten companies were 56.4% of the growth fund, led by a 13.65% position in a single chipmaker. Value spread the same job across 438 names, with its largest holding under 8%.

That is why growth moved harder in both directions. Higher prices and fewer names is the same trade viewed twice.

Key takeaway: Growth costs about 50% more per dollar of earnings, pays roughly a quarter of the income, and concentrates more than half the money in ten names.

5. Which side has actually won?

Quick Answer: Growth beat value over every multi-year stretch measured through July 17, 2026, including 25 years at 10.7% a year against 8.0%. Value was ahead only year to date. The three-year gap is the widest, at 24.2% a year against 14.4%, which is also the gap behind the VOO and VTI comparison.

Average Annual Total Return by Time Frame
Average annualized total returns for the S&P 500 Growth and S&P 500 Value indices over seven time frames through July 17, 2026.
Time frame Growth Value Gap
Year to date 9.3% 10.0% −0.7
1 year 20.3% 19.2% +1.1
3 years 24.2% 14.4% +9.8
5 years 13.5% 11.8% +1.7
10 years 17.4% 11.8% +5.6
15 years 16.1% 11.9% +4.2
25 years 10.7% 8.0% +2.7

Source: First Trust, using Bloomberg data through July 17, 2026. Gap is growth minus value, in percentage points. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Notice the shape of the growth vs value stocks record. The gap is small at 25 years and huge at three. A quarter century that includes the dot-com crash and the 2022 selloff still leaves growth ahead by 2.7 points a year, but most of the lead was earned recently.

The picture also depends on the finish line you pick. S&P’s own factor dashboard measured to July 31, 2026 put the two within a whisker of each other over 12 months: growth at 19.4% and value at 19.7%, against 19.6% for the S&P 500 itself.

Key takeaway: Growth leads on every long horizon, but shift the end date by two weeks and the one-year winner flips. Short-window claims about either style are close to noise.

Thinking about adding a style fund?

Check what your current holdings already tilt toward before you buy a second helping of it. See how to rebalance a portfolio →


6. The years that built the gap

Quick Answer: Growth won four of the last five calendar years, sometimes by more than 20 points. It lost one badly: in 2022 the growth index fell 29.41% while value fell just 5.22%. That single year is the clearest picture of what a style tilt does to a portfolio you are still contributing to.

Calendar Year Returns, 2021 to 2026
Calendar year total returns for the S&P 500 Growth and S&P 500 Value indices from 2021 through 2025, with 2026 year-to-date figures through July 17, 2026.
Year Growth Value Winner
2021 32.01% 24.90% Growth
2022 −29.41% −5.22% Value
2023 30.03% 22.23% Growth
2024 36.07% 12.29% Growth
2025 22.18% 13.19% Growth
2026 to July 17 9.3% 10.0% Value

Sources: benchmark index returns for 2021 to 2025 from iShares fund fact sheets, June 30, 2026; 2026 figures from First Trust, through July 17, 2026.

Run the math on 2022 with real money. A $50,000 growth position ended the year around $35,300. The same money in value ended around $47,400. The recovery was fast, but you had to sit through it without selling.

That is the trade-off in one line. Growth gave more in four years out of five, and took far more in the fifth. Companies cannot pay for placement in our rankings, and no index provider is picking the winner in advance either.

Key takeaway: Style leadership is streaky, and the bad year for growth was six times worse than the bad year for value.

7. Should you tilt one way or the other?

Quick Answer: For most people the answer is no. A broad S&P 500 or total market fund already holds both sides at their market weight, and a target date fund handles it for you. A tilt only makes sense if you can name what it is for and can hold it through a year like 2022.

How to check your growth and value split

Four steps, about fifteen minutes, once a year.

  1. List every stock fund you own. Include your 401(k) and IRA, not just the taxable account. Style tilts hide across accounts.
  2. Find each fund’s benchmark. The fund page names it. An S&P 500 or total market benchmark means no tilt; a growth or value benchmark means a deliberate one.
  3. Add up the dollars on each side. Broad funds count as roughly half and half, since the index splits its market value about evenly.
  4. Compare that to what you meant to hold. If you never chose a tilt and find 70% on one side, you found the gap. Close it with one trade, not five.

One caution on step four. Selling a tilt inside a taxable account can trigger a tax bill, so make the change inside a retirement account first where you can.

Key takeaway: The default is owning both at market weight. A tilt is an active decision that needs a reason and a holding period.

8. Five things people get wrong

Quick Answer: The five common errors are treating value as low-priced, assuming the two groups do not overlap, reading growth as risky and value as safe, buying a style after it has already run, and forgetting that a new listing lands in neither camp until it has a record: the reality behind buying into an IPO.

  • Value means a cheap share price. It does not. It means a low price against earnings, book value or sales, whatever the ticker costs.
  • The two groups are separate companies. They overlap by design. The growth and value funds together held 585 positions from a 500-stock index.
  • Growth is risky, value is safe. Value fell less in 2022, but it can stay cheap for years. Slow disappointment is still a loss.
  • Last year’s winner is next year’s pick. Growth beat value by 23.8 points in 2024 and trailed it year to date in 2026.
  • Every stock fits one label. Recent listings often lack the three-year sales and earnings history the growth score needs.
Key takeaway: Four of the five errors come from treating growth and value as descriptions of companies rather than scores applied to prices.

9. The verdict

Quick Answer: Own both, at market weight, through one broad fund. Growth’s long lead is real but concentrated in technology and in the last three years, and value’s insurance shows up only in bad years. Understanding the difference matters more than picking a side.

If you do want a tilt, size it so a repeat of 2022 would not change your plan. For a growth tilt that means accepting a drop near 30%. For a value tilt it means accepting years of lagging while technology runs.

The honest summary is that growth vs value stocks gets more attention than it deserves for most portfolios. The investing decisions that move the needle are how much you save, how long you leave it alone, and what you pay in fees.


10. Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the difference between growth and value stocks?

Growth vs value stocks is a question about price, not company quality. Growth stocks trade at high prices relative to their earnings and sales because investors expect fast expansion. Value stocks trade at low prices against book value, earnings and sales. S&P scores every S&P 500 company on three growth factors and three value factors, then splits the index roughly in half by market value.

2. Are growth stocks better than value stocks?

Growth has returned more over every multi-year period through July 17, 2026, including 10.7% a year over 25 years against 8.0% for value. That came with a higher price and a rougher ride: the growth index fell 29.41% in 2022 while value fell 5.22%. Neither is better in every environment.

3. Can one company be both a growth stock and a value stock?

Yes. S&P splits the market cap of companies that score on both sides across the two indexes. On June 30, 2026, Apple was the largest holding in the iShares S&P 500 Value ETF at 7.32% and the third largest in the growth version at 5.98%.

4. Do I already own growth and value stocks?

Almost certainly, if you hold an S&P 500 or total US market fund. Those indexes contain every stock in both style groups at market weight. You only have a tilt if you specifically bought a fund tracking a growth or value benchmark.

5. Are value stocks cheaper to buy?

Not in share price, and not in fees. The iShares S&P 500 Growth and Value ETFs both charged 0.18% as of June 30, 2026. Value was cheaper only in valuation terms, at 24.61 times earnings against 36.83 for growth.

Not sure whether you are tilted growth or value?

Send us the funds in your 401(k) and IRA and we will point you to the comparison that fits the gap. Companies cannot pay for placement in our rankings.

Ask us what to check →

This article is information, not financial advice. Index rules, fund holdings and returns change, so confirm current details with the index or fund provider before you act. See our full disclaimer.